14 sep

UPPDATERING

Jag tycker att det låter hotfullt i Syrienfientlig media, att det kan bli tal om kapitel 7 i FN, möjlighet att ta till våld, om inte det inte går enligt planen med överlämnandet av kem-vapnen. Men man får väl tro att Ryssland vet vad man gör. Det är kanske så att man låter Kerry/USA låta lite kaxiga för att det inte ska se ut som att de fick ge sig!?

voiceofrussia.com – Putin, Obama agree to exchange data on Syria’s chemical arsenal – Lavrov’s interview

The US has promised Russia to try to persuade the Western-recognized faction of the Syrian opposition to send delegates to the second Geneva conference on Syria.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has insisted on UN-authorized investigations into allegations that chemical arms have been smuggled from Europe into Syria.
”As regards reports on supposed supplies of chemical weapons from Europe, they need double-checking. All that must be put before the UN Security Council and investigated. If it is confirmed, the [smuggling] channels will have to be found out and cut short immediately,” Lavrov said in a Russian television program on Saturday.

VARNING! Lavrov varnar för att FN-rapporten som beräknas presenteras på måndag kan ha förvanskats.
Someone might be trying to retouch UN report on chemical attack in Syria – Lavrov

”There are grounds to suspect that someone might be currently trying to retouch the report to be presented on Monday this or that way compared to what the inspectors have actually written,” Lavrov said at a press conference following negotiations with US Secretary of State John Kerry in Geneva on Saturday.

Tony Cartalucci – Preempting The Next Round of Lies Against Syria, What the UN report on Syria will say & what the liars in the West will claim it says.

The bottom line regarding the UN’s upcoming report regarding the August 21, 2013 chemical weapons attack in Damascus, Syria is best summed up by the BBC’s article, ”Syria crisis: UN report to confirm chemical arms attack” [emphasis added]:
Ban Ki-moon made no comment on who was to blame for the 21 August attack in the Ghouta area of Damascus, as that is not part of the report’s remit.
Despite this, the United States and its axis of collaborators are already trying to spin the report as confirmation that the Syrian government was responsible.

Saudiske prins Bandar var på besök i Moskva i början av augusti. Efter att Putin sagt att de stod fast vid sin position vad gäller Syrien, sa Bandar att det nog inte fanns någon annan väg än en amerikansk militär inblandning. Ännu en intressant artikel av Yossef Bodansky med många fakta om hur attacken med kemiska vapen gick till en 21 aug, hur mycket man vill tro är sant får man själv ta ställning till – Syrian Chemical Attack: More Evidence Only Leads to More Questions – och oilprice.com

Toward the end of the meeting, Bandar again discussed the Syrian issue at length. He stressed that as far as Riyadh was concerned, there was no future for the Assad Administration. “The Syrian regime is finished as far as we and the majority of the Syrian people are concerned,” Bandar said, and they, the Syrian people, “will not allow President Bashar al-Assad to remain at the helm.”
Putin responded that Moscow’s “stance on Assad will never change. We believe that the Syrian regime is the best speaker on behalf of the Syrian people, and not those liver eaters.” Again, Bandar resorted to threats. He warned Putin that their dispute over the future of Syria led him, Bandar, to conclude that “there is no escape from the [US-led] military option, because it is the only currently available choice given that the political settlement ended in stalemate”. Bandar added that Riyadh saw no future for the negotiating process.

Several Arab leaders, as well as senior intelligence and defense officials from the Arabian Peninsula are now convinced that the chemical strike was aimed to provoke a US-led military intervention which would in turn lead to the toppling of Bashar al-Assad and the empowerment of an Islamist government in Damascus.

Christof Lehmann – CIA delivers Weapons to Insurgents in Syria

The CIA has been delivering weapons to insurgents in Syria for several weeks. The arms deliveries began after U.S. President Barak Obama decided to provide weapons for the foreign-backed insurgency and the visit of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Army General Martin Dempsey to Jordan at a time when major Saudi Arabian weapons shipments were delivered to the insurgents via Jordan.
The CIA weapons deliveries are classified as covert operation, which is limiting which committees of the U.S. Congress have access to the information.
Besides the delivery of light machine guns, the CIA has made arrangements for the insurgents to receive anti-tank weapons including rocket-propelled grenades through a third party, presumably one of the Gulf Arab countries, said a senior U.S. Intelligence official and two former intelligence officials on Thursday.
The statements were made on condition of anonymity because they were “not authorized to discuss the classified program publicly”.

Manuel Ochsenreiter, German journalist focusing on the Syrian crisis

Landmark Deal: US, Russia agree on dismantling Syria chem weapons

slut på uppdateringen _________________

theguardian.com – Syria crisis: US and Russia agree chemical weapons deal

The agreement seems to remove the prospect of any strike against Syria following the chemical attacks in Damascus on 21 August which killed up to 1,300 people.

”Any violations of procedures … would be looked at by the security council and if they are approved, the security council would take the required measures, concrete measures,” Lavrov said.
”Nothing is said about the use of force or about any automatic sanctions. All violations should be approved by the security council.”

rt.com – Turkish prosecutors indict Syrian rebels for seeking chemical weapons

A court indictment by the Turkish prosecutors into the alleged use of chemical weapons by the Syrian rebels has once again highlighted fears this week that sarin toxic gas was used by the opposition and not the Assad government.
The prosecutor in the Turkish city of Adana has issued a 132-page indictment, alleging that six men of the al-Qaeda-linked al-Nusra Front and Ahrar ash-Sham tried to seek out chemicals with the intent to produce the nerve agent, sarin gas, a number of Turkish publications reported.

Hans Blix, som var chef för vapeninspektörerna i Irak för 10 år sedan. Det är precis som han säger på slutet, ska det kunna bli ett slut kriget så måste vapenleveranserna till lego-krigarna upphöra.

  1. #1 av Obs på 14 september, 2013 - 14:10

    Kerry är en stor lögnhals och en sionist springpojk och som vill invadera och ödelägga Syrien för Israels räkning. Alla som hetsar mot Syrien för sionismens agenda!

    • #2 av Stan på 14 september, 2013 - 23:15

      Fick just syn på en artikel som visar på hur stort inflytande AIPAC har i USA, men just nu tycks det direkta hotet om ett angrepp ha avvärjts – http://original.antiwar.com/giraldi/2013/09/11/defeating-aipac-starts-with-syria/
      The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) has weighed into the debate big time, unleashing hundreds of its activists on Capitol Hill, buttonholing congressmen and staffers alike. This is how it works according to a congressional staffer: ”First come the phone calls from constituents who are AIPAC members. They know the Congressman and are nice and friendly and just tell him, or whichever staffer the constituent knows, just how important this vote is to him and his friends back in the district. Then the donors call. The folks who have hosted fundraisers. They are usually not only from the district but from New York or LA or Chicago. They repeat the message: this vote is very important. Contrary to what you might expect, they do not mention campaign money. They don’t have to. Because these callers are people who only know the Congressman through their checks, the threat not to write any more of them is implicit. Like the constituents, the donors are using AIPAC talking points which are simple and forceful. You can argue with them but they keep going back to the script… Then there are the AIPAC lobbyists, the professional staffers. They come in, with or without appointments. If the Congressman is in, they expect to see him immediately. If not, they will see a staffer. If they don’t like what they hear, they will keep coming back. They are very aggressive, no other lobby comes close. They expect to see the Member, not mere staff. Then there are the emails driven by the AIPAC website…and then the ‘Dear Colleague’ letters from Jewish House members saying how important the vote is for Israel and America. They also will buttonhole the Members on the House floor… And, truth be told, all the senior Jewish Members of the House are tight with AIPAC. Also, the two biggest AIPAC enforcers, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor and his Democratic counterpart, Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer, are fierce AIPAC partisans, and they make sure to seek out Members on the floor to tell them how they must vote. On anything related to Israel, they speak in one voice: AIPAC’s. Obviously, there is no counterpart to this on the antiwar side. No anti-AIPAC to speak of. AIPAC owns this issue. It gets what it wants.”

      • #3 av Obs på 15 september, 2013 - 12:30

        Vad var det vi sa?! Detta är ett krig för Israel.
        Idag har sionist springpojken John Kerry anlent i Tel Aviv för att avlägga rapport åt sina herrar Kriget mot Syrien förs av AIPAC, imperialister, terrorister och kannibaler,för att förverkliga Israels agenda för Mellanöstern. Sannerligen överträffar verkligheten dikten!!!

Kommentera

Fyll i dina uppgifter nedan eller klicka på en ikon för att logga in:

WordPress.com Logo

Du kommenterar med ditt WordPress.com-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Twitter-bild

Du kommenterar med ditt Twitter-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Facebook-foto

Du kommenterar med ditt Facebook-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Google+ photo

Du kommenterar med ditt Google+-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Ansluter till %s