Nu är det dags för högsta beredskapsläge igen när det gäller risken för en falsk arrangerad attack i Syrien! Som kan skyllas på landets ledning för att skaffa sig ett alibi för att äntligen få släppa lös attackhundarna mot landet. Redan i slutet av januari framkom uppgifter om att kemiska vapen hade flyttats från Libyen till Turkiet nära gränsen till Syrien. För idag kommer propaganda i finansgangstrarnas informationsblad som ska förbereda oss – USA vill säkra syriska regimens kemiska vapen – ”Den amerikanska militären har börjat planera för hur den ska kunna få kontroll över de mängder med kemiska och biologiska vapen som finns i Syrien den dag som Assad-regimen faller. Men Pentagon betonar att det måste ske inom ramen för en internationell operation.”
Det här är väl ganska genomskinligt, vad finns det för anledning att gå fram så här starkt med en massa snack om kemiska vapen nu!? De syriska styrkorna har ju just tagit kontroll över det ställe som de väpnade gängen hade mest kontroll över. På de flesta ställen är det lugnt, lugnare än på länge om jag förstått det rätt. De oroligheter som förekommer ligger nog de lego-krigare som skickas in från utlandet bakom, det finns 15 000 enligt en rysk ambassadör (se föregående inlägg). För några dagar sen kom den amerikanske armégeneralen Dempsey med det här:
Leon Panetta pushes back on calls for military intervention in Syria
Dempsey said among the military options are enforcement of a no-fly zone and humanitarian relief. He said a long-term, sustained air campaign would pose a challenge because Syria’s air defences are five times more sophisticated than Libya’s. He said Syria’s chemical and biological weapons stockpile is 100 times larger than Libya’s.
”We also need to be alert to extremists, who may return to well-trod ratlines running through Damascus, and other hostile actors, including Iran, which has been exploiting the situation and expanding its support to the regime,” Dempsey said. ”And we need to be especially alert to the fate of Syria’s chemical and biological weapons. They need to stay exactly where they are.”
Ett citat från en radiointervju jag hade med i ett inlägg den 30 jan:
..but I expect for these gangs to be granted permission to start their work, and perhaps use the chemical weapon, and when they use the chemical weapon, they might attempt to accuse the Syrian government, and we start a new scenario, similar to the Iraqi scenario or the Libyan one ..
“What does it mean that Erdogan and his intelligence and NATO intelligence training and fund camps for Syrian armed men under the title of humanitarian refugees in Turkey and Eskanderon district, and what does it mean (it is news that we are mentioning on Al Manar TV and we hope it receives the adequate concern) what does it mean to move large part of the Libyan chemical weapons arsenal to the Turkish territories, to the hands of insurgents, and along with it they brought Libyan fighters to Syria, and by the way, some Libyan fighters were killed on the Syrian soils…
Från ett inlägg den 18:e feb – Read the News About Syria From a Different Angle
Russians intel revealed a plot while listening to conversations that the FSA, the umbrella which all ‘rebels’, ‘freedom fighters’, ‘Salafis’, ‘Ikhwan’, ‘Al Qaeda’ and ‘thugs’ work under, was intending to use chemical weapons & commit a massacre then blame it on the Syrian army to cause discontent among the Syrian public, use it as a political card & maybe justify a swift military intervention.
U.S. / NATO forces have invaded Syria – Rysslands FN-ambassadör:
”We have information that in Libya, with support from the ‘authorities’, there is a special training center for Syrian rebels, and groups are sent from there to Syria, to attack the legal government,” said Churkin. He added: ”It is completely unacceptable. This practice is undermining stability in the Middle East.”
The charge appears after the website Wikileaks recently published a document that revealed that there are covert operations underway by U.S. and NATO forces inside Syria, against the government.
In a private message now released, an analyst working for the Texan company, Stratfor, says that in December of last year, he attended a meeting at the Pentagon where he heard that U.S. / NATO soldiers \were inside of Syrian territory, giving training to armed rebels.
Alexey Pilko – Fruits Of “Humanitarian Intervention”: Destruction Of States, Huge Civilian Casualties, Destabilization Of Countries
Republican Senator John McCain this week called for air strikes against Damascus. According to AFP, he said that it is necessary to disable the Syrian air defense system, at least in some parts of the country, to “establish and defend safe havens in Syria”. McCain makes no attempt to conceal the purpose of these “safe zones”. They could be used by an armed opposition to “organize and plan political and military activities”. The American politician openly advocated providing military assistance to the militants, “including weapons and ammunition.”
Of course, McCain is not the U.S. president. He lost the battle for the post to Barack Obama in 2008, and this time around he is not even standing for election. Nonetheless, the Senator has a clear influence on the formation of U.S. foreign policy. We recall that his proposal to launch an operation to oust Muammar Gaddafi received a warm response at the White House. John McCain even visited the rebel stronghold of Benghazi to show U.S. support for Libyan opposition fighters. Thus, we cannot rule out that Washington is preparing to launch a military campaign against Syria. McCain’s statement is intended to prepare world opinion for an inevitable war.
Of course, it is not a foregone conclusion that Washington will adopt Senator McCain’s proposed approach in Syria. However, statements by influential American hawks suggest it is at least being considered by the political leadership of the United States. This is quite worrying.
Therefore, Russia should closely monitor the mood on Capitol Hill. And if necessary, together with countries that share the same positions as Moscow, take diplomatic and other measures to prevent armed action against Syria in defiance of the UN Security Council. In the end, has nothing in the world changed since 1999?
RussiaToday – EU: ‘Military intervention in Syria would be disastrous’
EU foreign ministers have united to speak against military intervention in Syria, saying sanctions appear to be working. Meanwhile the UN humanitarian mission is slowly making its way in the troubled country.
On Friday EU foreign ministers gathered in Copenhagen for an informal meeting in which the issue of Syria topped the agenda.
Germany’s foreign minister, Guido Westerwelle, said any talk of military intervention was “counter-productive,” adding that “large-scale fire” would bring “really disastrous consequences for the region, the people, and the world.”
Kofi Annan expected in Damascus, About the preparations for a false war and the refusal of dialogues by the non-legitimated Syrian National Council
With the remarks of Mrs. Amos and the upcoming visit of Kofi Annan, there could be a small opportunity to avoid the U.S. plans to attack Syria. Not to mention that it would also be another false war based on propaganda, false information and dubious intentions, which would also be against international laws. After Netanyahu was in Washington, it was shortly announced afterwards, that all options to attack Syria are tested now.
These war options against Syria include humanitarian missions (a cover for war on ground), the protection of sea ways and limited air strikes – i.e. war on three levels. Considering the deaths of the NATO war in Libya and the situation in Syria, the war against Syria would even cost the lives of much more civilians – murdered by NATO.
It might sound harsh and false for the readers, but the truth isn`t always nice. The Syrian troop strength was assessed by the Americans already, all preparations were made. It seems they only argue about the question if the U.S. administration needs an international agreement for a war against Syria or not.