5 feb

Ryssland och Kina lade alltså in sina veton mot de resolutioner som väst ville ha igenom mot Syrien, och med vars hjälp de sannolikt hade tänkt komma närmare sitt mål, att få bort presidenten. Som jag förstått det fanns det t.ex. någon kryptisk skrivning om att ”andra åtgärder kunde bli aktuella” om inte våldet upphörde eller någonting i den stilen. Plus att man inte tillräckligt tydligt vill sätta fokus på de väpnade gruppernas betydelse för situationen, också en tydlig indikation om vem som ytterst ligger bakom dessa.
Men, det finns nog anledning att vara än mer på sin vakt efter detta. Inte ger de aggressiva västmakterna upp så lätt, särskilt inte just nu när hela deras ekonomiska system håller på att kollapsa. Uppgifterna om att kemiska vapen ska ha flyttats från Libyen till de trakter i Turkiet där de väpnade grupperna tränas och organiseras, är oroväckande. En omfattande attack med kemiska vapen inne i Syrien som västs massiva propaganda-maskin direkt skulle anklaga landets regering för att ligga bakom, kan nog inte uteslutas. från – Syria: The whole truth. Game on!

.. he said: ”expect a big event at the end of this month in Syria, or a dramatic change”, but I expect for these gangs to be granted permission to start their work, and perhaps use the chemical weapon, and when they use the chemical weapon, they might attempt to accuse the Syrian government, and we start a new scenario, similar to the Iraqi scenario or the Libyan one

Och idag kom Michel Chossudovsky med en artikel – Armed Groups Inside Syria: Prelude to a US-NATO Intervention?

There is ample evidence that the armed groups including Salafists, Al Qaeda affiliated militia as well as Muslim Brotherhood are covertly supported by Turkey, Israel and Saudi Arabia.
The insurgency in Syria has similar features to that of Libya, which was directly supported by British Special Forces operating out of Benghazi. According to former CIA official Philip Giraldi:
”NATO is already clandestinely engaged in the Syrian conflict, with Turkey taking the lead as U.S. proxy. Ankara’s foreign minister, Ahmet Davitoglu, has openly admitted that his country is prepared to invade as soon as there is agreement among the Western allies to do so. The intervention would be based on humanitarian principles, to defend the civilian population based on the “responsibility to protect” doctrine that was invoked to justify Libya. Turkish sources suggest that intervention would start with creation of a buffer zone along the Turkish-Syrian border and then be expanded. Aleppo, Syria’s largest and most cosmopolitan city, would be the crown jewel targeted by liberation forces.
Unmarked NATO warplanes are arriving at Turkish military bases close to Iskenderum on the Syrian border, delivering weapons from the late Muammar Gaddafi’s arsenals as well as volunteers from the Libyan Transitional National Council who are experienced in pitting local volunteers against trained soldiers, a skill they acquired confronting Gaddafi’s army. Iskenderum is also the seat of the Free Syrian Army, the armed wing of the Syrian National Council. French and British special forces trainers are on the ground, assisting the Syrian rebels while the CIA and U.S. Spec Ops are providing communications equipment and intelligence to assist the rebel cause, enabling the fighters to avoid concentrations of Syrian soldiers.”

Ford’s mandate in Damascus is to replicate the ”Salvador Option” in Syria, by promoting covertly the development of an armed insurrection.
Reports point to the development of a full-fledged and well organized armed insurgency supported, trained and equipped by NATO and Turkey’s High Command. According to Israeli intelligence sources:
”NATO headquarters in Brussels and the Turkish high command are meanwhile drawing up plans for their first military step in Syria, which is to arm the rebels with weapons for combating the tanks and helicopters spearheading the Assad regime’s crackdown on dissent. Instead of repeating the Libyan model of air strikes, NATO strategists are thinking more in terms of pouring large quantities of anti-tank and anti-air rockets, mortars and heavy machine guns into the protest centers for beating back the government armored forces.” (DEBKAfile, NATO to give rebels anti-tank weapons, August 14, 2011)

Philip Giraldi – NATO Versus Syria: NATO Clandestinely Engaged in Syrian Conflict, CIA Analysts Skeptical Regarding March to War

CIA analysts are skeptical regarding the march to war. The frequently cited United Nations report that more than 3,500 civilians have been killed by Assad’s soldiers is based largely on rebel sources and is uncorroborated. The Agency has refused to sign off on the claims. Likewise, accounts of mass defections from the Syrian Army and pitched battles between deserters and loyal soldiers appear to be a fabrication, with few defections being confirmed independently. Syrian government claims that it is being assaulted by rebels who are armed, trained, and financed by foreign governments are more true than false.

En buffert-zon är kanske det första delmålet man siktar på. Inte flyg-attacker som i Libyen utan tung beväpning av väpnade grupper.

En utförlig artikel om tidigare misslyckade försök att etablera en buffert-zon – The ”Blue Jasmine” … The complete story about the buffer zone on the Turkish borders..

The NATO have always said that Syria is not Libya, and it really meant that, because Syria is indeed not like Libya, but in secret and under the table, the (US) NATO said to its allies (Qatar and Turkey) that Syria is like Libya, and Jisr Al Shughur and Idleb are like Binghazi, and how the (Turkish and Qatari) bet on creating a buffer zone, and Washington realized that the buffer zone will be similar to Darfur not to Binghazi, quite the contrary to what NATO promised its allies, when tried involve them in a big problem that it will allow the NATO to negotiate on their heads, as the NATO fully realize that the no-fly zone over Syria means burning the Middle East and perhaps the entire world.

BREAKING: Russia Points to ”Armed Groups” in Syria, Vetoes UN Security Council Draft Resolution

Syrian forces arrest Saudi intelligence agent in Syria’s Homs

The Syrian government has repeatedly accused several Arab states including Saudi Arabia and Qatar of fueling the unrest in Syria by providing armed gangs in the country with weapons and financial resources to incite civil war and topple the government of President Bashar al-Asad.

Från bloggen Third World, 31 jan – Aftonbladet trappar upp sin propaganda mot Syrien

Lisa Karpova beskriver situationen bra. Som vanligt träffsäkert och med sin friska, rättframma stil – Disgusting USA and Rice, are you going to STOP now?

The west, and particularly the USA, have engineered, financed, armed, trained and encouraged civil war in the Middle East and Africa. In truth, the so-called ”Arab Spring” was an Arab spring cleaning. That is to say, time for the Empire to ”clean out” those nations that won’t cooperate with their disgusting full spectrum world domination plan.
They have deliberately and with malice of forethought formented these civil wars and ”rebellions” that are destroying the tranquil, peaceful lives of men, women and children. They pretend to have an interest in the peace and safety of the people, when the opposite is true. They have no interest in seeing the violence come to an end.

”The United States is disgusted that a couple of members of this Council continue to prevent us from fulfilling our sole purpose,” U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice said.
Yes, we know your purpose, Ms. Rice. To destabilize countries. To kill their people. To destroy their way of life. To take over the world and make it groan under your heels.
”For months this Council has been held hostage by a couple of members,” she said, referring to Russia and China, who she said had been ”delaying and stripping bare any text to force Assad to stop his actions.”
And who, Ms. Rice, is going to stop YOU from your murderous, evil, demonic actions?

Ett utförligt och intressant inlägg om det som kan vara planen bakom kampanjen mot Syrien – Is the Syrian Revolution a Spontaneous Public Uprising?

  1. #1 av skvitt på 5 februari, 2012 - 19:50

    Mycket bra inlägg. Visst är det de geostrategiska målen som främst USA har i regionen som styr det som sker. Och vi ser nu resultatet av att USA plötsligt har slutit fred med al-Qaida.
    Jag menar dock att det aldrig har varit osämja mellan USA och terrornätverket. De har bakom kulisserna spelat i samma lag. Jag undrar hur många som begriper det.

    Bloggtips: maverablogg på wordpress: http://maverablogg.wordpress.com/ Och THIRD WORLD-


    • #2 av Stan på 5 februari, 2012 - 22:59

      Det kan väl knappast vara på annat sätt än att det är en kampanj som är arrangerad av ungefär samma länder som angrep Libyen. Och att planerna är att gå vidare mot Iran, och sen..? Det är ganska oerhört hur stor medialögnen är, t.ex. om al-Qaida. En bra benämning är al- CIAda, det är väl deras skapelse. Jag brukar länka till Mavera, och jag såg just att Third World också hade ett inlägg om Syrien nu, tack för tipsen.


Fyll i dina uppgifter nedan eller klicka på en ikon för att logga in:

WordPress.com Logo

Du kommenterar med ditt WordPress.com-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )


Du kommenterar med ditt Google+-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )


Du kommenterar med ditt Twitter-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )


Du kommenterar med ditt Facebook-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )


Ansluter till %s